Should they simple accept that Hamas will launch 10-20 rockets per day into Israel and do nothing? And what exactly would be a “proportionate response?” Would that be to randomly fire an equal number of unguided missiles into the West Bank and let them fall where they may, regardless of the distribution of the civilian population?
My other thought is directed to all people of a more liberal persuasion: You should give the Reverend Rick Warren, and more importantly the people who follow him, a break over his speaking at the Obama inauguration.
I realize he and his followers stand for some things that you could never support. But while he is probably well to the right of you, he is a long way from the extreme end of the belief curve, and represents a moderating influence on many people.
Barack Obama only won 53% of the votes in November, which leaves a lot of Americans looking at him sideways, just waiting for a signal that he truly doesn’t care about people like them. Inviting Warren to speak was a political olive branch to a group of people whose support Obama will need if he is to solve the many problems facing our country. These problems are big beyond the imagination’s ability to grasp them, and we can’t afford a continuation of the political and social polarity that has kept us from addressing them for decades.
By definition, that means working with people with whom we may not be in complete agreement, and someone has to be the bigger person – the one who takes the first step. Isn’t that why you voted for Obama in the first place?

