Tuesday, February 17, 2009

The First Heroes

I’m reading a book called The First Heroes, which is about the Doolittle raid on Japan in the early months of WWII. I’ve know the basic story since I was a kid, but like any good book, the real soul of the story is contained in the details, and The First Heroes delivers.

Here’s the basic story. In April 1942, eighty men, all volunteers, flew 16 B-25’s off of the USS Hornet over 650 miles of Pacific Ocean to successfully bomb Tokyo and a few other Japanese cities. It was the first American victory of any kind, coming four months after Pearle Harbor and a string of Japanese military successes against us.

All the men were told they were volunteering for an exceptionally dangerous mission, and were given several opportunities to back out as they learned more details. None did. Very briefly, here is what they had to deal with.

First of all, no one had every taken off from an aircraft carrier in a B-25 (or anything remotely like it) until these guys did it in the middle of a raging storm, from a deck less that half as long as the normal runway length used by that plane.

The storm produced 60 foot swells. As each plane took off the deck was aimed downhill, so that the pilots stared directly into the ocean as they gained speed. But the Navy deck crewed planned each launch precisely so that half way down the deck it began to pitch up by 30º and reached its peak as each bomber got to the end, thus aiding lift. All 16 launched successfully.

Unfortunately, the Navy task force had been detected and they launched several hundred miles earlier than called for in the original plan. This was a big problem for several reasons. They were supposed to fly to Japan, and then continue another 600 miles to free China (as opposed to the much closer Japanese occupied China). The pilots knew before leaving the carrier that it was problematic that they would have enough fuel to make it; the extra distance dictated by the early launch meant that they would almost certainly have to ditch in occupied China, or into the sea. They all took off anyway.

The original plan called for arriving over Tokyo at dawn, but the new schedule put them there at high noon, with no fighter escort, and with half their normal defensive weapons removed to make room for extra fuel tanks. (They did put broomsticks in the ball turrets to simulate machine gun barrels.)

It was perfect weather over Japan. Every plane dropped its bombs and most hit their target. The Japanese were taken completely by surprise, and while there was heavy antiaircraft fire and Zeros rose to meet the B-25’s, somehow none were shot down.

Then they had a bit of luck when the winds shifted in their favor, which gave them renewed hope that they could reach free China. But instead of having a radio beacon to home in on (confusion over the International dateline had it turned off) they continued to rely on dead-reckoning via the stars and their homemade, hand drawn maps. Their trip was more like those made by 16th century explorers than by modern navigators.

So on they flew for more than 12 hours to the China coast, then south to avoid occupied territory, until their fuel began to run out. Unfortunately, the early take off change brought them to this point of their flight in the middle of the night, and in the midst of another major storm.
Of the 16 bombers, one landed safely, wheels-down in Russia. That’s a whole other story. Three essentially crash-landed on beaches or just off shore. Because of the heavy cloud cover, the other 12 planes could find no safe landing options and took the only option open to them – they jumped out.

Among all the crewmen in those planes, only Colonel Doolittle had every parachuted before, and he broke both ankles upon landing. But as the giants Billys (as they called the B-25’s) began to cough, sputter and lose altitude, the crews put on the chutes and jumped into the black void. They had no idea what was below them – river, ocean, mountain, Japanese army camp? They just jumped.

I’m having a hard time getting these images out of my head. For one thing, they keep raising uncomfortable questions like, “would I have ever had the courage to do what these men, whose average age was probably around 24, did?”

For another, I can’t help but to contrast the selflessness and bravery of these average Americans, who were the first heroes of the War, with the character displayed by the business and political leadership of our country these days. How did things change so much, and can we ever return to those values?

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ah, yes, the story of a great generation. I don't think I ever really thanked my parents for all the great things they did for us. Goin to war was a different thing when I was young. It just never will conjour up "the good war, the just war." Maybe that's what our problem is - the uncertainty of our time. No just wars to go off and fight for on my watch. It was more like, as Pete Seeger said years ago on The Smother's Brothers Show, "Knee deep in the big muddy, and the damn fool says march on!"

Anonymous said...

If you need other images in your head try this. Last night I watched Dr. Strangelove. G C Scott getting a call from his girlfriend in the War Room or Slim Pickins riding the bomb down. Today I'd be willing to pilot the B52 off any carrier as long as the target was Washington DC. The patroitism is still there you'v just got the enemy part confused.

Anonymous said...

You are Monty Phython, and now for something completely different.So many of us were raised or influenced by these silent heroes,that only by their passing would they let us think of them as such.As men are age they sat as the silent majority through the Vietnam era,went to work and tried to live the American dream. Dying by droves now in their 80's they see an America not really working and their version of the American dream castrated by bankers,politicians and lawyers which made common sense living a stressed out tedious complicated mess.I am afraid folks when we are near our end we won't be half as tough.

Anonymous said...

Easy Gaga. I'm only a mile from your ground zero. We don't want any collateral damage now do we?

This event was made into a movie in 1944 "30 seconds over Tokyo" with Van Johnson. I think he piloted the Ruptured Duck. Also, it was portrayed in the 2nd half of that awful "Pearl Harbor" movie with Ben Affleck. Alec Baldwin was Jimmy Doolittle if you can believe that.

WWII was pretty God awful for those poor guys that had to fight it. A whole generation of 23 year old men come back from Europe and the Pacific with serious PTSD and survivor guilt and have to live the rest of their lives tamping it down with alcohol and cigarettes and never talking about it. The guys that died in combat were hardly the only casualties and never are. Just take a look at the thousands of aging Vietnam Vets that show up for Rolling Thunder on Memorial day in DC. They're a pretty twitchy bunch.

This latest dustup in the middle east will provide the next generation of men and women that drink too much and can't sleep at night. Let's hope we treat them better than we did the vets from the last 3 wars.

I don't know how I got going on that jag. Doolittle's Raiders provided the shot in the arm to a very demoralized country. We sure could use them now.

Anonymous said...

The last two times I was in the Atlanta airport, I met brave young men on their way to Afganistan.

They were all volunteers.

Bravery is alive and well, you just have to open your eyes to see it.

d'blank said...

I should have acknowledged that it still exists; I was remarking more on its absense from the higher economic strata of our society.

Anonymous said...

Yes, there are still brave men. But the sick, feminist culture that has ruined America calls guys like Doolittle "macho" and of course, that's a bad, bad, BAD thing.

It cuts across all of society. Howard Hughes was a swashbuckler - contrast him with his counterpart of today... Bill Gates- professional drip. Bogart vs. Brad Pitt. Jack London vs. Perez Hilton. Elvis vs. Marilyn Manson. Henry Clay vs. Nancy Pelosi... TR vs BHO.
Normal is bad. Ozzie and Harriet became a joke while Ellen, Rosie, Etheridge, Octomommy, etc. are venerated for their selfish insanity. Honest talk has become "hate speech."

America is in desperate trouble because the beliefs that made it great have been warped beyond straightening. While we were busy watching our loss in Viet Nam, we were losing the culture war at home. It began sometime in the mid 60’s. It ended this past January 20

There are now two Americas.

It’s time they were recognized and apportioned.

Deciding who goes where will be a snap. Anyone using the phrases “that’s inappropriate” and/or “that’s offensive” identifies him/herself as a cultural Marxist and must report to their local community organizer for further instructions.

Anonymous said...

FIYF, have you forgotten to take your medication again?

d'blank said...

Fisty – I think you give the PC crowd way too much credit. The only things they run are certain parts of the media and a few highly ineffective non-governmental organizations. They do make a lot of noise, which I think even most liberals find irritating, but they are mostly just ignored by probably at least 80% of the population. If they ever actually did make a serious attempt to take over our lives they be beaten down by the masses.
If I’m wrong then we are the frog that is gradually being boiled in a pot of water that, at the moment, is no more than 105 F – there’s plenty of time to jump out if we don’t doze off.

kgwhit said...

Good point Fist. We all long for the days when the only good indian was a dead indian. When there was a campaign afoot to send the Irish back to Ireland. When women could not vote or own property. I personally liked the idea when it was illegal to hold political office in New Jersey if you were a Jew. Here in Virginia, the home of separation of church and state, it was against the law to be a catholic. Now if you could just get the blacks, jews and mackerel snappers out of the country and the women back in the kitchen, then we'd be great again.

Anonymous said...

Sorry you feel that way, kgwhit. It's certainly not the America I was referring to. But you're entitled to you opinions.

Ah, little Hanky. You never have an answer for my opinions.
Only personal insults, of a fifth grade caliber. Perhaps this cyber sandbox is a bit out of your league?

kgwhit said...

Fist, I am in awe of what my Father and Uncles did during WWII, and my Grandfathers in WWI. For most, it was worse than my time in Vietnam.
I just don't think those vets were the greatest people in dealing with their lives after the came home. They were tagged as brave and swashbucklers and I know many of them never felt that way but tried to live up to the John Wayne image of the strong silent type. Read "Our Fathers War", written by a friend of Bird and mine, about how those combat vets related to their families after the war.
I think we are in a better place because of the civil rights and women's movements. Does some of the pc stuff rub me the wrong way, you bet, but I don't want to go back.

Anonymous said...

FIYF, always the victim, full of answers: what a burden.

Been having conversations with your creator lately?

Anonymous said...

Wow. FIYF--that's really sad. Blaming the "feminist culture" for de-macho-ing men? Macho's great....directed accordingly. Random, shoot-em up macho is pretty pathetic. Howard Hughes became something much much less than macho...very sad.
Here's a curve ball for you---Paul Newman. Macho. Sensitive. Giving. Genuine. Loving. A balanced person, like a balanced country has both feminine and masculine qualities...all used appropriately. For example, I myself am a very feminine woman who also birdhunts, fly-fishes, rides, surfs, skis, runs multi-million dollar divisions (not today however) who would rather not wind up like D'Blank's story of today----with my head chopped off by a woman hater.

Anonymous said...

Comparing James Doolittle – a guy who inarguably was macho – with Paul Newman – an actor who sometimes played macho?

Newman’s image was carefully controlled and crafted by the very best publicists in Hollywood. Did you know Paul personally? Well enough to verify all those rather intimate qualities?

In his prime Howard Hughes had plenty o' guts. He was a bigger-than-life, fascinating figure. What’s the riskiest thing Bill Gates has done? And yes, Howard’s compass malfunctioned and he died rather ignobly – at age 71. Gates is only 53. We’ve yet to know how he’ll wind up.

I also shoot (competitively), occasionally hunt, gamefish, ride, ski and run a multi-million-dollar enterprise. I also make a hell of an omelet and can rock a screaming infant to sleep faster than many women. Exactly what bearing does any of that have on masculinity or femininity?

About that psycho in Buffalo. Are you certain he was a woman hater? How about just a "domestic partner hater?" Should we assume then, that his countrymen who lopped off Nick Berg’s head were therefore man-haters?

Anonymous said...

I was calling you a woman hater. "The sick feminist culture that ruined America" ?! Puleeeeze!