Thursday, February 12, 2009

The Greatest American

Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address Saturday, March 4, 1865

Weeks of wet weather preceding Lincoln's second inauguration had caused Pennsylvania Avenue to become a sea of mud and standing water. Thousands of spectators stood in thick mud at the Capitol grounds to hear the President. As he stood on the East Portico to take the executive oath, the completed Capitol dome over the President's head was a physical reminder of the resolve of his Administration throughout the years of civil war. Chief Justice Salmon Chase administered the oath of office. In little more than a month, the President would be assassinated.

Fellow-Countrymen: At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.

On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.

One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

14 comments:

Unknown said...

Let's not forget the coincidence that another man who also shook the world was born on the same day, Charles Darwin. Neither was religious but both had a great sense of faith.

I just heard a piece on NPR on the conclusion of On the Origin of Species. Darwin had lost his 10 year old daughter to illness. He looked at the world and saw the brutal, senseless struggle for survival. Yet he concluded that as terrible as it is, it had produced wonderful creatures, his daughter being one.

Lincoln and Darwin are still hated by many although they represent the best in humanity. They strove for order and understanding.

d'blank said...

Hankster -- I knew you'd be the one to make the Darwin-Lincoln connection. Pretty amazing that two such impactful people would be born on the same day.

Anonymous said...

Obviously, both of you must of watched the special on PBS.Did you catch the piece on the sons of confederate soldiers.And some people ask whats wrong with this country..

Anonymous said...

Hank is smarter than us. Of course he got the connection. I heard the Robert Krulwich story as well. Really interesting. Same day, same year. Not bad.

kgwhit said...

And to think that three of the GOP candidates for President were not sure about evolution. Makes you wonder how many didn't believe in the Emancipation Proclamation either.

Anonymous said...

There is no evidence in the fossil record to support the theory of the slow transformation of species into other species. Not anywhere on this planet.

Darwinists can sift through every square inch of the earth's surface in search of "the missing link." Until it is found, his theories will remain... theories.

Global warming is also a theory… and like Darwinism, has morphed into orthodoxy.

It is without merit and based on junk science.

The Goracle and his minions are that stupid.

Just for the record, Honest Abe wasn’t all that honest. Many historians say his agenda was more about more about protectionist tariffs, central banking and obedience to the state than the abolition of slavery.

Sharing a birthday with Darwin is interesting only when observing Lincoln’s simian appearance. Or maybe that was the tertiary syphilis -- contracted from prostitutes -- collapsing his face. (With that mug, who could blame him for screwing hookers?)

And while I'm at it, his bombastic oration is highly overrated. It needed a damn good editing.

Teddy Roosevelt… now that was a president.

Anonymous said...

FIYF, either you don't understand the nature of irony or you have finally pulled down your pants and shown everyone on this blog that all your holding is a pair of deuces. When you defend ignorance, you are ignorant.

d'blank said...

Oh boy.

Anonymous said...

Fisty, You are correct. There is a reason why they are called Theroies. Abe was a politician. He didn't believe in slavery but he did believe whites were above the blacks/indians. Have not came across any mention of the yellow man. Historians call it Depression, he might of suffered bouts of disturbed thinking from a spirochete that burrowed into his brain. I agree with choice of TR. We need someone cranked up on three pots of coffee daily and mad as hell..

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure what your point is FIYF. Do you believe that creationism is correct? Intelligent design? Are the ice caps melting because there are too many hairdryers in the artic circle.

As for Lincoln, it doesn't really matter what his "agenda" was, it matters what he did. And what he did was nothing short of remarkable. And this coming from someone who's family was on the losing end of that little tussel called the Civil War. As for his bombastic writing/speaking style, compared to the orators of his day who would speak for hours on end, his style is the soul of brevity.

Sneering contempt is not a persuasive arguement.

Anonymous said...

Ah, Hankster. Though we’ve not met, I’ll wager you are little squirt. Usually the type, when flummoxed by truth and logic, sprout cyber muscles. Lilliputian males are often conflicted sexually, hence their bizarre tendency to attack the genitalia of full-statured men.

Before throwing the ignorance spear, grab yourself a course in remedial English. In the context of your post, it’s “you're,” not “your.”

Birdman, melting ice caps are a theory, not a fact. Same as evolution. And whether I prefer creationism or intergalactic pollination has nothing to do with the fact that Evolution and Global Warming remain theories.

Lincoln’s remarkable achievement was to preside over a conflict that yielded three quarters of a million deaths.

“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”
-Lincoln, March 4, 1861.

You read my opinions as sneering contempt? I read yours as blind acceptance of popular myths, enveloped in a cloud of jingoism.

d'blank said...

Where is Rodney King when we really need him?

It’s ironic that a post on Lincoln (“With malice toward none, with charity for all”) should spark such, ah, fervor.

So I have a question: while I believe in evolution, isn’t FIYF correct that it is a theory rather than a fact? But isn’t Newton’s law of gravity also a theory? Isn’t it virtually impossible to actually prove many of these grand scientific theories given the complexity and scope of the questions?

Anonymous said...

Cut to the quick! How did you know I am 4'7" with a lisp and a hunchback? You've been Googling my images, haven't you?

The term the "theory" when used in the scientific sense has a different meaning than used by Colombo. Just as Dennis mentioned, gravity is a theory. How about hard testing it by jumping out of a 4 story window? So much for your understanding of science...

Your ramble is nonsense. If you had actually spent some time following the evidence of evolution, you wouldn't be posting your ignorance for all the world to see. You come across like a good old boy solving the world's problems over too much alcohol.

As for your fondness for TR, he was devastated when his son died in WWI. That was as close as he got to understanding the downside of the glories of war.

d'blank said...

Hey, there's a great discussion going on in today's post. no theories involved. check it out.